rickles23
31st March 2011, 12:43
Hi,
I have now written/typed the first two chapters of a book about my Late Father's wartime history and the men and ships he met along the way.
When it was proof read an interesting thought raised its ugly head.
Consider the following sentences:
In 1936, two new Coast Lines standard ships, Royal Scotsman
and Royal Ulsterman (both 3000 grt), were built for the
Burns & Laird Glasgow-Belfast service.
In 1936, two new Coast Lines standard ships, Royal Scotsman
and Royal Ulsterman (both 3000 grt), were built for the
Burns & Laird Glasgow-Belfast service.
In 1936, two new Coast Lines standard ships, Royal Scotsman
and Royal Ulsterman (both 3000 grt), were built for the
Burns & Laird Glasgow-Belfast service.
Which do you think is the better way to have the ship's name?
Regards..(Scribe)
I have now written/typed the first two chapters of a book about my Late Father's wartime history and the men and ships he met along the way.
When it was proof read an interesting thought raised its ugly head.
Consider the following sentences:
In 1936, two new Coast Lines standard ships, Royal Scotsman
and Royal Ulsterman (both 3000 grt), were built for the
Burns & Laird Glasgow-Belfast service.
In 1936, two new Coast Lines standard ships, Royal Scotsman
and Royal Ulsterman (both 3000 grt), were built for the
Burns & Laird Glasgow-Belfast service.
In 1936, two new Coast Lines standard ships, Royal Scotsman
and Royal Ulsterman (both 3000 grt), were built for the
Burns & Laird Glasgow-Belfast service.
Which do you think is the better way to have the ship's name?
Regards..(Scribe)