| Welcome | |
| Welcome to Ships Nostalgia, the world's greatest online community for people worldwide with an interest in ships and shipping. Whether you are crew, ex-crew, ship enthusiasts or cruisers, this is the forum for you. And what's more, it's completely FREE. Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more. Click here to join. |
|
|
|
ViewsOrion class battleship- HMS OrionFrom SN Guides
[edit] The name OrionUndated shot of orion scanned from an old postcard of my fathers, the fact that she still carries her tall topmast and is still fitted with anti-torpedo net booms shows that this picture was taken before 1915 when the net booms were removed. Orion is the name of a constellation, which gets its name from a legendary Greek hunter killed by a scorpion sent by Artemis, the actual origin of Orion is not known but may be related to Greek ‘οριον (horion). Ther have been seven ships in the Royal navy bearing the name which dates back to 1787, there was also another ship to be named Orion, an armoured cruiser planned for 1904 but the order was cancelled before construction started
[edit] Class information'another scan from my fathers collection this shows purports to show the four Orion class ships as the second division of the 2nd BS - L to R, Orion (leading) Monarch, Conqueror and Thunderer. undated but pre WW1 say circa 1913', I think the lead ship of the four belongs to another class and this shows three of the Orions : Orion, Monarch and Conqueror with the two bands on the funnel) Thunderer had three bands on the aft funnel
On examining the Orion class the design comes across as sleeker and more refined than earlier ships, outwardly similar to the following King George the 5th class the two could be told apart by the Orion's fore mast being placed behind the forward funnel, this reulted in the fire control top at the mast head being heavily affected by smoke, heat and gasses from the funnel, not a good design feature at all. One other feature of the ships was dictated by the size of the dry-docks available at the time, the size of the ships was the maximum that could fit into these drydocks and something had to give, the bilge keels were omitted, initially the ships rolled heavily and if reports in the tabloids of the times had to be believed the class would capsize in any sea. In truth the rolling whilst undesirable was not this severe and the class were fitted with bilge keels but the size and design was a compromise between effect and dock size. Another problem facing the designers was were to place the mast, place it in front of the funnel and the spotting top would be clear of smoke and heat with a head wind but another problem then appeared, where to put the derrick needed to hoist the boats. The Orion class would seem to have bowed to the seamanship problem and placed the mast aft of the fore funnel to allow the fitting of a large derrick for hoisting the ships boats, this did cause problems with smoke and heat in the spotting top. To partially alleviate this the fore funnel was smaller in diameter than the aft funnel and only vented six boilers and the remaining twelve vented via the aft funnel. [edit] Building dataBuilt by Portsmouth Dockyard under the 1909 naval estimates, she was laid down in November 1909, and commissioned in January 1912, building costs were £1,855,917. [edit] Basic DetailsLength 581' beam 88'06" , draft 27'06" displacement 21,922 tons standard and 25,596 tons full load [edit] MachineryThe machinery arrangement for the Orion class was very similar to that of the earlier Colossus class with quadruple propellers being driven by Parsons direct drive steam turbines. The machinery spaces were split into three with the inboard shafts leading to the centre engine room and the outer shafts the port and starboard wing engine rooms. The two inboard shafts were driven by the high pressure ahead and astern turbines with the ahead turbines having an extra stage for cruising, this was separated from the main turbine by a bypass valve. The outer shafts were driven by the ahead and astern low pressure turbines, for cruising the out board turbines would be shut down , the ship relying on the inboard shafts alone. The boilers of greater power remained in three groups of six with eighteen boilers in total, although coal fired oil spraying equipment was fitted for quickly raising steam. The normal power for Orion was 27,000 SHP giving 21 knots on her trials on the 19th November 1911 she attained just over 31,000 SHP which gave 21.045 knots this would seem to indicate that she could not quite achieve her design 21 knots at normal power. Finding details of the machinery layout of these old ships is quite daunting, I obtained details of the layout from studying a minute plan with a magnifying glass, the deatails are as accurates as I can get them for the moment SW 21 oct 2007 [edit] ArmamentMain battery
The main battery consisted of ten 13.5” guns arranged in five twin turrets all mounted on the centre-line and enabled this class to fire a ten gun broadside without any risk of structural damage to the ship, problems still existed with the open sighting hoods of the lower turrets ( A & Y) in that to prevent muzzle blast of the two upper turrets ( B & X) entering the lower turrets via the sighting hoods, firing of the upper turrets was prevented from right ahead to 30 degrees on either bow for A turret and 30 degrees either side of right astern for X turret, the mid-ships turret was designated ‘Q’.
Courtesy of MaritimeQuest, this is another early image of Orion, she is still carrying her tall top mast which was removed during WW1 Secondary battery As with the Dreadnoughts the secondary batteries of the Orion class were rather weak comprising sixteen 4" C50 Mk7 installed in 14 casemate mounts and two open mounts, I can find no data on the two open mounts but the may well have been HA weapons for use against aircraft, the case mate mounts would be useless for this kind of assailant. Approximately 700 of these guns were produced in the early 1900's and nearly 500 of them were still in use in the second world war but in civilian DEMS ( Defensively Armed Merchant Ships). They fired a 31lb shell to 11,500 yards and a good crew could achieve a rate of fire of 8 RPM but normally this would be 6 RPM ( rounds per minute). This weapon lacked the stopping power to prevent a determined attacking torpedo boat. four 3 pounder signalling guns were also fitted [edit] Torpedo armamentThis remained the same as the earlier Colossus class with three submerged 21" torpedo tubes , one firing on each beam and one astern. The torpedoes used by the Orion class battleships were the Whitehead 21" Mk2 these had a range of 4,000 yards at 35 knots or 5,500 yards at 30 knots and had a TNT warhead of about 400 lbs. Although Robert Whitehead had been born in Bolton, England he was running another buisness in Milan when he started out in the torpedo manufacturing buisness, however although the British Admiralty wanted to order his torpedoes ( and they did in vast numbers) they were not prepared to buy them from Italy so a factory was set up in England near Portland - this was were they tested the torpedoes so it was logical to set the factory up there, in 1914 at the outbreak of war the Admiralty seized control of the factory. [edit] Armour ProtectionThe earlier Dreadnoughts had one major failing, the side armour belt was quite shallow in depth and at full load was often submerged making it useless as a shell could pass over the top of and cause flooding- quite apart from the internal damage it would cause. The Orion class cured this defect by being the first British battleships to carry the side armour belt up to the upper deck, the belt was also increased in thickness to 12” tapering down to 8” below the waterline, all vertical armour being Krupp Cemented Armour Plate ( KC). The armoured bulkheads which closed off the citadel were 10" thick both forward and aft, in previous designs the aft bulkhead was of lighter construction, presumably assuming attack would come from ahead not astern. The main turret barbettes were 10” thick tapering to 3” were they were inside other armour. Turret faces were of 11” plate other thicknesses on the turrets are not known at the time of writing. Decks the armour deck was of 4” Non Cemented NC armour , the maximum thickness was maintained over the machinery and magazine spaces and tapered down to 1” in non vulnerable areas, for details of the cementing process see :- HMS Warspite armour. [edit] Service HistoryWhen she was commissioned in January 1912 Orion became the flagship of 2nd Division of the Home Fleet, on the 07th January 1912, around the time of her commissioning, whilst at anchor the old pre-dreadnought Royal sovereign class battleship Revenge broke loose from her moorings and drifted into Orion. However, neither ship experienced any significant damage as a result of this.
This image comes courtesy of Dick Sloan SN member, and shows the two ships after the collision, Orion's bow is in the left of the shot with the Revenge filling the centre of the photograph, it can be seen that the revenge has open type barbette mouted guns, the guns of both the Orion and the Revenge are of 13.5" calibre but 18 years separates the two designs, the Orion's were the first ship to use the 13.5" gun since the Revenge class but the two weapons are widly different and the later gun is not based on the earlier model. In August 1914 Orion became part of the Grand Fleet, where she was the flagship of the 2nd Division of the 2nd Battle Squadron.
Orion (foreground) at the Scrapyard along with HMS Erin - Photo courtesy of SN member Stein. The after funnel is at the extreme right of the picture and the large ring showing aft of the funnel is the upper edge of 'Q' turret's 10" barbette Armour.
[edit] Bibliography
http://www.maritimequest.com/warship_directory/great_britain/battleships/orion/hms_orion.htm
|
||||||||