| Welcome | |
| Welcome to Ships Nostalgia, the world's greatest online community for people worldwide with an interest in ships and shipping. Whether you are crew, ex-crew, ship enthusiasts or cruisers, this is the forum for you. And what's more, it's completely FREE. Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more. Click here to join. |
|
|
|
ViewsQueen Mary class Battle-Cruiser - HMS Queen MaryFrom SN Guides
[edit] The name Queen MaryAn early image of the Queen Mary, she kept her anti torpedo nets throughout her short life, note the towering topmasts for the radio aerials, these were fitted for her intended world wide service, these were removed as the war for these ships became centred on the North Sea, this indicates an early image of the ship- although due to her early loss these may not have been removed image scanned from a magazine clipping of my fathers This was a name new to the Royal Navy, the ship being named after Her Majesty Queen Mary, Queen Consort of King George V. Queen Mary, born as Mary Princess Mary of Teck, launched the ship HMS Queen Mary on the 20th May 1912, thankfully she was not given Queen Mary’s full name : Victoria Mary Augusta Louise Olga Pauline Claudine Agnes. Since the loss of the ship on the 31st may 1916 the name has not been, and probably never will be, used again. [edit] Class informationAlthough appearing similar to the two ships of the lions class ( Lion and princess Royal) and often quoted as the third ship of that class the Queen Mary was no more than a half sister coming about halfway between the development of Britain’s best battle-cruiser of this era, the Tiger, and the lion class and as such formed a single ship of her own class. The principle differences were the change from the 13.5” Mk5 L gun firing a 1,250 lb shell to the 13.5” Mk5 H gun firing a 1,400 shell, an additional 5,000 shp of propulsive power , she was also 3’06” longer, 6” wider and 6” deeper, if externally she was similar to the Lion class internal she was quite different, to tell her from her half sisters examine the funnels, the Queen Mary’s were round whilst the Lion’s were oval and the forward 4” secondary battery was contained on a single deck whilst the Lion’s had a single gun on the second deck of the forward superstructure. One feature which was removed from other ships to prevent their fouling propellers and steering if damaged in battle but not removed from the Queen Mary were her torpedo nets and booms, these remain with her on the bottom of the North Sea. One other difference made the Queen Mary easily told from her sisters, she had an Admirals gallery on her stern.
[edit] Building dataQueen Mary was ordered under the 1910 naval estimates and was built by Palmers Shipyard at Jarrow on the south bank of the River Tyne, she was laid down on the 06th march 1911 and launched by her namesake, Queen Mary, on the 20th May 1912, she cost a little over two million pounds to build. The famous Palmers shipyard yard was opened in 1851 by the two Palmer brothers Charles and George building many famous ships and once employing over 10,000 people, it closed its doors for good in 1933 Queen mary on her launch day image courtesy of Martimequest website [edit] Basic DetailsL 703’06” B 89’00” Draft 28’00” Displacement 26,770 tons standard and 31,650 tons full load [edit] MachineryQuadruple propellers were driven by Parsons direct drive steam turbines and forty-two Yarrow type large tube coal fire boilers, of nominally 75,000 shp and 27.5 Knots she attained 28.3 knots on trials for a little over 83,000 shp The machinery consisted of a high pressure ahead and astern turbine on the inboard shafts and a low pressure ahead and astern on the two outboard shafts, the inboard shafts also incorporated an ahead cruising turbine for fuel economy. The machinery installation being split into two engine spaces separated by a centre-line watertight bulkhead. Her bunker capacity of 3,700 tons of coal and 1,170 tons of oil gave her a range of 5,600 miles at 10 knots and 2,400 miles at 24 knots Steering was by twin rudders.
[edit] ArmamentMain battery
Y turret on the Queen Mary giving a good view of the 13.5" guns with their Tompions carrying Queen Mary's seal in place, note the upper edge of the 9" barbette armour clearly seen arround the base of the turret, also note the two aft firing 4" guns of each of the port and starboard after batteries protruding from their casemates above Y turret , this image may have been taken during her 1915 January-February refit at Portsmouth but as she is mounting awning spars may be earlier as a new ship being finished off - image courtesy of the Maritimequest website
The Queen Mary had sixteen single casemate mount 4” C50 Mk7 guns in her secondary batteries, the same number as the Lion class, but whereas the Lions had the forward pair of guns in the forward deck house mounted one over the other the Queen Mary’s guns were all mounted on one level on the foc’sle deck . The guns were mounted in four batteries of four guns each, one battery to port and starboard in the forward deck house and one either side the after deck house, they were so arranged that four guns could fire right ahead or astern and eight could fire on either beam. These weapons fired a shell weighing about 35lbs using a separate bagged charge of about 5.5lbs of cordite to a range of 5 miles at a rather low elevation of twenty degrees, this low elevation combined with the guns being in case mates meant that they were only suitable for surface targets. For anti-aircraft use four 3 pounder Hotchkiss guns were mounted aft, of little use they were really only of use as saluting guns , these useless weapons were removed in early 1915 In 1914 a single 12 pounder C45 Mk1 gun was fitted aft , the 12 pounder whose actual bore was 3” fired a shell weighing a little under 13 pounds to a height of about 22-23,000 feet and a surface range of 5 miles. These guns were usually called 12 pounders but could be called 3” or even 20cwt guns, 20 cwt being the overall weight of the gun. In addition a single 6 pounder Hotchkiss gun was also fitted aft [edit] Fire Control equipmentAt the time of her completion Queen Mary, like other ships at that time was not immediately fitted with fire control equipment. Her director and fire control equipment was fitted in December 1925 when she was two years old, other ships had the director system added to the spotting top but on the QM it was fitted to the roof of the armoured conning tower. Previously each individual gun was aimed and fired by its own turret captain with data obtained from the turrets own fire control instruments , to control and concentrate the fire of newer ships all guns came under control of the gunnery officer in the gunnery director . The Queen Mary was fitted with a Mk2 Dreyer table and where the Lion class were fitted with a Dreyer- Elphinstone clock., the Queen Mary was fitted with one of the few Argo clocks fitted in RN ships, she was also the only battle-cruiser to be so fitted , the Mk4 Argo clock was a superior piece of equipment, this was proved through gunnery trials to be more accurate particularly when the target and own ships courses where widely different and there was a large change in relative bearings and distances, so much better was this equipment that the Queen Mary was known as a crack gunnery ship in the RN. Queen Mary was fitted with a Mk2 Dreyer table, the table was invented by Admiral Sir Frederic Charles Dreyer, and was in fact a mechanical computer which from a large number of variable inputs a deflection required to be applied to the guns to hit a moving target could be calculated and automatically applied to the range and bearing pointers in the turrets, basically it calculated were the target would be at the end of the flight of the shell. The inputs fed into the table were : Range in yards from the range finders, bearing also from the range finder, Own ships heading and speed from the gyro compasses and, at that time, the Forbes log, range corrections verbally received from the spotting ( director) officer, these would be of the order when, say, the shells landed short : range plus 500 yards, Targets estimated course and speed , if the main range finder failed then there was provision for manual ranges and bearings to be inputted, this ‘table’ actually looked very little like a table other than it had four legs and was about six feet long by 2 feet 6 wide it more resembled an engineer’s work bench with some odd looking machinery bolted to it plus a large number of input clocks and handles . Range finding was by a nine-foot base coincident type range finder manufactured by Barr and Stroud. Barr and Stroud’s was founded in 1888 by two inventors, Archibald Barr who became the Professor of Engineering at Glasgow university and William Stroud who was the Professor of Physics at the Yorkshire College Initially working from a small workshop in Glasgow they later moved to a large factory at Anniesland in 1904. The coincidence range-finder consisted of a single eye-piece in the centre of a long tube with two lenses facing the target at either end of the tube, prisms are rotated by a dial and thus range is read off the dial corresponding to the angle of the prisms. Much has been written about the supposed superiority of German range finders which used the Stereoscopic principle, these worked in a similar way but used two eye-pieces, one advantage of the German system was that it did not as absorb as much light as did the British system so it would work better in poor lighting so on first sighting of each other the German range finders gave the edge over the British units in that they were more likely to obtain an early hit. But once the British had got the range their superior fire control meant that they would keep on hitting with greater frequency. [edit] Torpedo armamentTwo 21” submerged torpedoes were fitted, one on either beam in a torpedo space located forwards of A turret, the tubes themselves were fixed and projected into the torpedo body room were the reloads were stored, after firing only one tube at a time could be reloaded due to constrictions of space in the room. [edit] Armour ProtectionThere are two ways of viewing the level of protection for the Queen Mary and for that matter any other battle-cruiser of the RN at that time, if she was viewed as an armoured cruiser and her duties were what she was designed for, the chasing down of commerce raiders then her protection was good and perfectly up to the job, if she is to be used for something for which she was not designed : The line of battle standing her ground with battleships then that level of protection was poor. The lower main belt extending some 6 feet below the water and three above was 9” thick with a 4” belt above that, both belts ran from just forward of A turret barbette to just aft of Y Turret barbette covering the hull over the magazines and machinery. Closing off the armoured citadel at the ends of these belts was an armoured bulkhead of 4” forward and aft , the barbettes were 9” when outside of other armour but tapering to 3” inside other armour. The decks were 21/2” over the machinery and magazines and just 1” elsewhere, proof against light to moderate cruiser fire only. Turret faces were 9” with 3” on the sides and roof, the control tower was protected by 10” plating
[edit] Service HistoryOn Completion of her trials and working up the Queen Mary joined the 1st. Cruiser squadron (1CS) in the September of 1914, the term battle-cruiser was soon after coined and the 1CS became the 1st. Battle-Cruiser Squadron (IBCS) in January 1914. When WW1 was declared on the 28th July 1914 the RN’s capital ships, including the Queen Mary, maintained a blockade of all German trade, largely for the capital ships this was a watch and wait period of inactivity, the first battle to involve the Queen May was the first battle of Heligoland Bight on the 28th August 1914. Heligoland Bight Action ( first) It was known that German light mine-laying forces and supporting torpedo boats ( the German name for destroyers) were working from the Jade and Elbe rivers in the Heligoland Bight and it was the intentions of Commodore Reginald Tyrwhitt’s light cruiser and destroyers forces out of Harwich to intercept and destroy some of these forces. The initial attack by Tyrwhitt in the light cruisers Arethusa and Fearless with 16 destroyers each was on these German light forces with the intention of drawing out heavier German units over a line of seven D and E class submarines. Backing up Tyrwhitt in close support were the six light cruisers of Commodore W.E. Goodenough’s 1st LCS |: Southampton (flag), Birmingham, Falmouth, Liverpool, Lowestoft and Nottingham , and as distant cover at the last minute Admiral Jellicoe assigned the three ships of Admiral David Beatty’s 1BCS – Lion (flag) , Princess Royal and the Queen Mary and the two ships of Admiral John Moore’s 2BCS New Zealand (flag) and Invincible Due to a failure of communications neither Tyrhwitt nor Goodenough were aware of Beattie’s forces being assigned, nor were Beatty and Goodenough aware of the submarines, thankfully a chance meeting of the forces before the battle put these unknowns correct. The initial contact between the two light forces went the way of the British plan, although the day was bright with good initial visibility a mist of the western horizon hid the supporting ships from the German view, the time of the attack had been for low water on the River jade were the German heavy forces were thus preventing them leaving until the tide made sufficiently for them to safely cross the bar. The British forces initially attacked two destroyers G187 and 194 with great success but as more German light cruisers responded to this attack and the fact that Tyrwhitt though that some German heavy forces were in the vicinity her requested the assistance of Beatty. Beatty is his typical dashing fashion wading in with his battle-cruisers, the 1BCS being faster at 28 knots left the 2BCS behind at their more sedate 25 knots, Between 1135 and 1200 Beattie’s ships burst of the fog and Lion immediately engaged the light cruiser Koln with two salvoes virtually disabling her, the following battle-cruisers tore this hapless ship to pieces sinking her with repeated salvoes with her went the German Konter-Admiral Leberect-Maass and all but one of her crew, the effect of the battle-cruisers was described as a tribe of elephants stampeding through a pack of dogs, next to feel their heavy salvoes was the light cruiser Ariadne, she was hit so often and burning furiously the heavy smoke hide her from view and saved her from the fate of the Koln, the light cruiser Stralsund took her in tow later but she capsized and sank before reaching port. Forming mist made the battle confused and dangerous from all sides and 1300 Beatty signalled a recall and the British ships returned to port, although communications had been poor between both forces the battle-cruisers had distinguished themselves well in the task for which they had been designed : the destruction the of opposing fleets scouting cruisers. Britain had lost no ships however two light cruisers and three destroyers had received considerable damage, 35 men had been killed and 40 injured whilst the Germans had had three light cruisers sunk and one torpedo boat sunk, and three light cruisers damaged – 1 severely plus a number of destroyers, more than 700 killed with nearly 350 taken prisoner – both sides had gallantly rescued survivors.
1605 ( approx) a 13.5” hit exploded below the water line below the starboard wing turret causing the hull to be bulged in over an area of 40 x 15 feet and causing localised flooding. 1617 13.5” struck the hull side plating aft of the aftermost starboard 5.9” gun casemate on the junction between the 9” and *2 side armour belts over a 6” bulkhead, it exploded on contact blowing a large hole in the armour plating and in the 6” bulkhead, the hit was just above the battery deck which had a hole of 20 square feet blown in it, splinters entered the case mate causing a lot of damage , the aft 5.9” gun was put out of action, luckily flash protection kept the flash out of the magazines but all but one of the crew in this area were killed, smoke and gas from the explosion penetrated the starboard engine rooms ( HP and LP) causing their temporary evacuation.
The exact delay between the second and third explosions is not recorded but the crew of Y gun aft feeling the explosion of the hits and the ship starting to heel over and the second explosion left the turret and witnessed the third explosion destroy the fore-part of the ship which was separate from the after-part and already sinking , this was in all certainty the forward magazines, this was also supported by witnesses who survived from Q turret amidships , shortly after this QM was hit again aft with a further large explosion aft, this was possibly the after 4” magazine exploding, the range of this engagement was about 14,500 yards. Tiger immediately astern and with New Zealand astern of her were both showered in red-hot debris after steaming through the smoke of the explosion, the pillar of smoke rose to over 2,000 feet. Of the Queen Mary’s crew of 1,266 men 18 were picked by the destroyer HMS laurel, a further survivor was picked by another destroyer Petard and another two were rescued by the German destroyer G8, 21 men, leaving 1,245 men still with their ship, tragically the Petard was sunk shortly afterwards putting the survivor through a further ordeal which he thankfully survived A pall of smoke marking the grave of 1,245 men Image although freely available is courtesy of the Martimequest website - this is the clearest copy I have found to date Today the wreck, the deepest of all the Jutland wrecks, lies mainly upside down, shattered but clearly torn into two halves, due to the depth of water the wreck has not suffered the attentions of the salvage scavengers that the other Jutland wrecks have suffered, she is now a protected wreck site, a search of the internet will reveal many sites with photographs of her sad remains, it is now look, remember, but do not touch. [edit] BibliographyBibliography: IWM,
Article completed 28th November 2008 by Steve Woodward |