Save the Type 22s - Ships Nostalgia
05:47

Welcome
Welcome!Welcome to Ships Nostalgia, the world's greatest online community for people worldwide with an interest in ships and shipping. Whether you are crew, ex-crew, ship enthusiasts or cruisers, this is the forum for you. And what's more, it's completely FREE.

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.
Log in
User Name Password

Save the Type 22s

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 6th November 2007, 21:14
boulton's Avatar
boulton boulton is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 142
Save the Type 22s

During the “Sea Power Demonstration”, in the south-west approaches for the benefit of the “great and the good” (journalists !!), WARSHIP INTERNATIONAL FLEET REVIEW’s editor Mr Iain Ballantyne enjoyed (another) interview with Admiral Sir James Burnell-Nugent, CinC Fleet, as reported in the latest issue dated December 2007 (Pages 32-33+).

“The admiral was asked about claims in the media that the cost of securing the CVFs within the defence budget was going to be the loss of the remaining four Type 22 frigates“.

We would all (presumably) like to think the admiral’s comments were meant to reassure us of the Type 22s continued future serving within the Royal Navy.

“What I can tell you is that they are valuable ships, well-built, with lots of room and a lot of life left in them. They are very capable. Who knows what they could do in the future, as they handle so many roles”.

So far Boulton has not been put in a position where he has had to form, or voice, an opinion of this gentleman. However, I am certain that he NOT a poorly or ill-educated person. His further response therefore warrants some scrutiny.

“The admiral indicated the Type 22s were not the sort of ships that, as CinC Fleet, he wouldn’t want to give up”.

Removing (as I think were are entitled and obliged to do), the double-negatives from the above further statement, the actual meaning of what Admiral Sir James Burnell-Nugent said is,

. . . THE TYPE 22s WERE THE SORT OF SHIPS THAT, AS CinC FLEET, HE WOULD WANT TO GIVE UP.

Does this actually disclose that the Admiral knows, that with the crews released from a couple of Type 22s (2 x 250 = 500), he could man 2.7 of the newer, less man-power dependent Type 23s (2.7 x 185 = 499.5) ??
__________________
Andrew J Boulton
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 7th November 2007, 02:36
AncientBrit's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
My location
Posts: 1,589
Since scribes began taking notes of what General or Admirals said, those same Generals and Admirals have bafflegabbed a lucrative living for an unending stream of inquisitive and investigative reporters all determined to get to the truth of the matter. All of these reporters failed to recognize however, that it dont mean poop!
Relax, pull another beer, the new world order allows that we all stop worrying about that which we cannot change and place our trust in George Dubyah Bush who is out there somewhere, as we type, deciding what is best for us.
PS. If you have Weapons of Mass Destruction, I would suggest you get rid of them.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 7th November 2007, 03:12
cboots cboots is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 876
Admiral Sir James Burnell-Nugent - at the present rate it will not be too much longer before the venerable admiral has more names than his navy has boats.
CBoots
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 7th November 2007, 11:48
Paul UK's Avatar
Paul UK Paul UK is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 949
I dont know about WMD but I would really scared if I had Oil, o,h my god I wonder if GWB knows were Scotland is.

Paul


Quote:
Originally Posted by AncientBrit View Post
Since scribes began taking notes of what General or Admirals said, those same Generals and Admirals have bafflegabbed a lucrative living for an unending stream of inquisitive and investigative reporters all determined to get to the truth of the matter. All of these reporters failed to recognize however, that it dont mean poop!
Relax, pull another beer, the new world order allows that we all stop worrying about that which we cannot change and place our trust in George Dubyah Bush who is out there somewhere, as we type, deciding what is best for us.
PS. If you have Weapons of Mass Destruction, I would suggest you get rid of them.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24th November 2007, 12:35
boulton's Avatar
boulton boulton is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 142
Confirmation of Admiral Sir James Burnell-Nugent's committment to Type 22.

Quote:
Originally Posted by boulton View Post
“What I can tell you is that they (the remaining Type 22s), are valuable ships, well-built, with lots of room and a lot of life left in them. They are very capable. Who knows what they could do in the future, as they handle so many roles”.
I've just taken a phone call from WARSHIP INTERNATIONAL FLEET REVIEW’s editor Mr Iain Ballantyne, who has received a letter from myself, in which I drew attention to the (possible) "duplicity" in the reported statement by Admiral Sir James Burnell-Nugent, CinC Fleet.

Iain acknowledged that the "double negative", was a typographical error, and should not be construed as implying any lack of committment to the remaining Type 22 by Admiral Sir James Burnell-Nugent.

The letter, with an editorial comment acknowledging the unfortunate confusion, are to be published in the next issue of the WARSHIP INTERNATIONAL FLEET REVIEW magazine - a "good read", that I can heartily recommend.

I think we can now accept that " . . the admiral’s comments were meant to reassure us of the Type 22s continued future serving within the Royal Navy".
__________________
Andrew J Boulton
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 1st December 2007, 13:43
boulton's Avatar
boulton boulton is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 142
Intentions of the new CINC Admiral Sir Mark Stanhope.

The latest NAVY NEWS (dated December 2007, page 4), reports that,

“Admiral Sir Mark Stanhope has taken over from Admiral Sir James Burnell-Newgent as the nation’s second most senior sailor”.

After some confusion in the reporting by the monthly magazine WARSHIP INTERNATIONAL FLEET REVIEW (eventually clarified by Mr Iain Ballantyne, editor), it was assumed we could be confident, that comments made by the retiring CINC Fleet,

“Admiral Sir James Burnell-Nugent - the venerable admiral (with) more names than his navy (will have) boats“. (Cboots)

" . . were meant to reassure us of the Type 22s continued future serving within the Royal Navy".

It is presumed that now, everything will be back in the “melting-pot”, and we will have to again wait and ponder the intentions of the new CINC Admiral Sir Mark Stanhope - until Mr Iain Ballantyne, or another editor, can pin him against a bulk-head and question the good gentleman as to his intentions.
__________________
Andrew J Boulton

Last edited by boulton : 2nd December 2007 at 12:22.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Researching the Spinningdale class trawlers Gavin Gait Fishing Vessels 21 11th March 2013 10:29
Who designed the Type 42? boulton Royal Navy 29 31st May 2010 05:40
Grimsby trawlers, MTBs and Type 22 Frigates abudd63 Say Hello 7 3rd January 2009 02:02
Manning of civilian (de-commissioned) Type 42 Destroyers boulton Royal Navy 56 24th October 2008 08:43
Type 45s abroad Gibdan Royal Navy 2 20th March 2007 14:27



Search the net with ask.com
Support SN
Ask.com and get


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.