Water tube boilers - Ships Nostalgia
14:45

Welcome
Welcome!Welcome to Ships Nostalgia, the world's greatest online community for people worldwide with an interest in ships and shipping. Whether you are crew, ex-crew, ship enthusiasts or cruisers, this is the forum for you. And what's more, it's completely FREE.

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.
Log in
User Name Password

Water tube boilers

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 24th August 2008, 12:50
David Davies's Avatar
David Davies David Davies is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
My location
Posts: 723
Water tube boilers

As a mere decky may I ask this question. Why were some turbine ships with water tube boiler so dirty and sooty on the after deck, whilst others were not? My experience of NZSCo Pipiriki and the rest of the "P" class and of course the "Horrible Rata" Horarata all circa 1940s was that they were very sooty abaft the funnel. My later experience of this type of ship, BISNCo Nowshera and other "N"s circa 1955s, was that one did not notice this problem, although I believe BI's Kenya and Uganda made a lot of soot, they even gave Uganda a taller funnel to alleviate this problem.
David D
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24th August 2008, 15:58
BlythSpirit's Avatar
BlythSpirit BlythSpirit is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,241
David,

The soot from boilers landing on the afterdeck during sootblowing operations had more to do with the positioning of the ship during sootblowing. We always informed the bridge watchkeeper prior to starting. Most of them would alter course, if prudent, to minimise depositing the soot on the ship.
As an afterthought, the older LNG tankers very rarely needed to "blow tubes" when burning the cargo boiloff, which was methane. It is a nice clean burning fuel which can be seen in your domestic gas cooker.
__________________
Regards,
BlythSpirit

" For those in peril of the sea ......."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24th August 2008, 17:11
Jim S Jim S is offline   SN Supporter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,270
Some of Fyffes steam ships had Air Puff sootblowers on Babcock Header Type boilers. These used compressed air instead of steam and normally operated continuosly 24 hours/day by means of a sequencing device.
By this method soot discharges from the funnel were minimised.
This type of sootblowing would probably not suit all types of boiler.
On the general question of dirty, sooty afterdecks the velocity of exhaust from the funnel and the funnel design has a lot to do with where the deposits land. Over the years there have been many weird and wonderful funnel designs some more successful than others. For example the winged funnels on liner France, the fireman's helmet of Canadian Pacific's Empresses, the Thorneycroft smoke deflecting funnel design of P and O's Himalaya and Chusan, Shaw Savill's Gothic. Booth's Hubert and the various stove pipes on Ellerman ships for instance. Albeit on a Scotch Boilered ship Brocklebanks answer to boiler fumes affecting the aft crew accommodation was simply to heighten Maipura's funnel by some 11 feet or so.

Last edited by Jim S : 24th August 2008 at 19:35.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25th August 2008, 04:23
surfaceblow surfaceblow is online now  
Senior Member
Organisation: Other Merchant Fleets
Department: Engineering
Active: 1972 - 2005
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
My location
Posts: 1,289
I had a few discussions with the Mate on Watch when I had to blow tubes due to high stack temperatures. One was that I could not blow tubes since it was raining outside. I always called the bridge to inform them before blowing tubes since we reduced the speed and increased the boilers draft. It was up to Mate to turn the ship if he did not want the deck department to clean the soot off the deck. I do not remember asking permission just that we were going to blow tubes.

I was Chief on a T2 tanker that wandered into a missile testing range. (The deck department did not read the nav tex on the bridge. No R/O to blame). Walking back toward the house from sounding the fuel tanks (2) for the noon report I saw a missile go over the ship from my position on deck it looked very close followed by a jet then a helicopter that was hovering just behind the house down wind from the stack. At the same time the Second Engineer started to blow tubes the helicopter started to slow down and veer away from the ship and toward the water before the helicopter regained its control and speed. The helicopter left the area at a high rate of speed.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Life at sea with BP ChiefCharles BP Shipping 45 25th June 2013 15:52
What on earth did engineers on steam ships do? benjidog The Engine Room 258 11th December 2012 16:39
11 Days in a Lifeboat during WW2 alastairrussell Wrecks 2 21st February 2011 14:41
Nautical News & Views from Yesteryear K urgess News and Views from the Shipping World 76 30th March 2008 22:09
Sinking of the Oronsay during WW2 alastairrussell P & O 1 10th November 2007 14:48



Search the net with ask.com
Support SN
Ask.com and get


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.