Podded Propulsion on QM2 - Ships Nostalgia
19:31

Welcome
Welcome!Welcome to Ships Nostalgia, the world's greatest online community for people worldwide with an interest in ships and shipping. Whether you are crew, ex-crew, ship enthusiasts or cruisers, this is the forum for you. And what's more, it's completely FREE.

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.
Log in
User Name Password

Podded Propulsion on QM2

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 25th October 2005, 13:03
PeterG's Avatar
PeterG PeterG is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 270
Podded Propulsion on QM2

Never knew that QM2 runs on Podded Propulsion - saves Cunard millions in fuel costs, reduces pollution, vibration levels, and gives much better manouverability.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25th October 2005, 14:38
Mark Taxis Mark Taxis is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 85
I believe that each pod weighs in at 250 tonnes
Rgds
Mark
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25th October 2005, 15:33
Paul UK's Avatar
Paul UK Paul UK is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 949
According to the designer they are like each one is like a 737 hanging underneath.

Paul
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25th October 2005, 16:13
R58484956's Avatar
Super Moderator
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Department: Engineering
Active: 1952 - 1965
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 13,716
4 pods 250 tons each two forward ones fixed for/aft, after two 360 degree turn. power = 21.5 mw each. individually & hydrodynamically shaped for speed. Stainless steel props highly screwed fixed pitch.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25th October 2005, 19:17
newda898 newda898 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 648
And easier to replace should there be motor problems!
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25th October 2005, 22:23
PeterG's Avatar
PeterG PeterG is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 270
Thanks for all of that info - I only found out about the QM2's propulsion at a University Open Day for Naval Architecture. Really impressive those statistics!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25th October 2005, 23:31
Tom Haywood's Avatar
Tom Haywood Tom Haywood is offline  
Senior Member
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Department: Engineering
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
My location
Posts: 2,980
The discovery cable channel had a great doc on the propulsion system on the QM2.
Very interesting and it did lean a bit to the technical side of things. Worth looking at if (and it will) it comes around again.
__________________
Tom Haywood
R822244
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26th October 2005, 14:29
PeterG's Avatar
PeterG PeterG is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 270
Sadly we don't get discovery, but thanks for that.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 14th December 2005, 07:23
Finnjet Finnjet is offline  
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4
i get discovery channel and its a good thing note is that there a programme called building QM2 on there
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 14th December 2005, 22:48
moaf moaf is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
My location
Posts: 606
The good thing about podded propulsion is there is no shaft alignment , therefore engines can be laid out better. The QM2 has gas turbines on the funnel deck, coupled to alternators, for booster engines. These are simply wired into the pods. You can also get 360 degree propulsion from them. The fixed pods are aft, but the propeller faces into the water. This gives much more efficiency, as the full face of the prop is presented to the water
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 14th December 2005, 23:13
terence terence is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
My location
Posts: 28,120
14 nights queens grill 26.839 or a bit cheeper 11 nights 24.049 tell
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 15th December 2005, 17:49
fred henderson's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,095
QM 2 propusion arrangements

A slight clarification to your post Moaf. QM 2 has four Wärtsilä 16V46C diesel engines, each driving an ABB alternator with an output of 16,800 kW and two General Electric (USA) LM25000+ gas turbines each driving a Brush alternator with an output of 25,000 kW. The total 117,200 kW power capacity is connected to the main switchboard and alternators are brought on line as required to meet variations in the combined propulsion and hotel demand.
This power station concept has been used in the design of new cruise ships for more than 15 years. The major advantage is that the engines in use at any one time are operating within their optimum power range. There is also greater flexibility in the location of the machinery spaces. As you state Moaf, in the QM 2 the gas turbines are located in the base of the funnel housing.
The QM 2 has four Alstom/Kamawa Mermaid propulsion pods, each having an output of 21,500 kW. The arrangement is that the forward pair are outboard and fixed each side of the central skeg. The after pair are inboard, astern of the skeg and capable of azimuthing through 360 degrees. All face forward to enable the propellers to bite into clear undisturbed water. The propellers are about 20 feet in diameter with bolt-on, fixed, stainless steel blades. There are no rudders or stern thrusters, but she has three Rolls-Royce Kamawa bow thrusters, each of 1,500 kW output.
The attached pic and those that I have placed in the Machinery gallery are from the Cunard commemorative book and the special RINA book on the building of the QM 2.

Fred
Attached Images
File Type: jpg QM2 Pod 1 007.jpg (47.2 KB, 38 views)

Last edited by fred henderson : 15th December 2005 at 18:03.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 15th December 2005, 20:06
newda898 newda898 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 648
There's nothing under there?!?!?? She's going to sink!!
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 15th December 2005, 21:51
william dillon's Avatar
william dillon william dillon is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
My location
Posts: 1,299
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterG
Never knew that QM2 runs on Podded Propulsion - saves Cunard millions in fuel costs, reduces pollution, vibration levels, and gives much better manouverability.
So where do the paddle wheels come into this propulsion system ???? lol.
Billy
__________________
Best Regards
Billy
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 15th December 2005, 23:10
Super Moderator
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Department: Engineering
Active: 1962 - 2005
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
My location
Posts: 6,714
Only paddles would be the swizzle sticks.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 15th December 2005, 23:17
moaf moaf is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
My location
Posts: 606
Fred, I did mean that, but you are better at writting it down than me!! Had just finished a 16 hour shift too, so couldn't stretch my little mind to go into too much detail!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Search the net with ask.com
Support SN
Ask.com and get


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.