The Great New v Old Debate - Ships Nostalgia
19:31

Welcome
Welcome!Welcome to Ships Nostalgia, the world's greatest online community for people worldwide with an interest in ships and shipping. Whether you are crew, ex-crew, ship enthusiasts or cruisers, this is the forum for you. And what's more, it's completely FREE.

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.
Log in
User Name Password

The Great New v Old Debate

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 20th September 2006, 11:39
Chris Isaac's Avatar
Senior Member
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Department: Deck
Active: 1962 - 1980
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
My location
Posts: 3,164
The Great New v Old Debate

I have seen much discussion (heated at times) about the merits of new passenger ships versus the grace of the old.
Most of us were at sea during the 50s 60s and 70s undoubtedly the zenith of the British Passenger Fleet.
My own personal views favour the old but I think many of us must feel a great deal of regret that absolutely nothing was done to preserve a little bit of that glorious heritage.
The Queen Elizabeth was allowed to go at the end of her useful life.
The Canberra and Windsor Castle, both hauled up a beach and ripped apart.
Only the Americans placed some value on that heritage and preserved the Queen Mary.
Cunard, P & O and Union Castle were the greatest of our shipping companies and we did very nearly nothing to preserve the past. I was for a time a member of the group trying to preserve Windsor Castle, it came to nothing as we could not find patronage or funding, despite approaching government and Royalty.
Its all well and good us all getting dewy eyed about the past but as a nation, we blew it!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20th September 2006, 13:23
Pat McCardle's Avatar
Pat McCardle Pat McCardle is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,895
Well said Chris & so very, very true!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20th September 2006, 13:34
Jan Hendrik's Avatar
Jan Hendrik Jan Hendrik is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,959
Preservation of ss Rotterdam is in progress.
She will be moored at a top location in Rotterdam by mid next year.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20th September 2006, 15:40
fredkinghorn fredkinghorn is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1
We always seem to want to preserve the past by public subscription. I cannot recall a, shipping company willing to hand over a redundant vessel and/or pay a part of its preservation.
In Scotland we have an abundance of old castles and houses that were "given" to the Nation as part of an Inheritance Tax deal. The owners still live in most of them and the upkeep is paid for by the taxpayer.
It is the same with paintings etc. given over, they are supposed to be available to the public for viewing. Try and get to see any of them. To be honest, I think that the upkeep of a ship must cost an anormous amount of money. Better if we took the money and started a fund for ex.M.N. guys on hard times.

fred

" look forwards "
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 31st March 2007, 05:59
PatBaltic22's Avatar
PatBaltic22 PatBaltic22 is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 34
Chris, the White Star Line held some of the most famous British liners of all time also. Besides the Titanic, there were other extremely popular liners in Britain; the "Big Four" which consisted of the Baltic, Celtic, Cedric, and Adriatic. Not to mention the Britannic (1920), Olympic, and the tender Nomadic.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 31st March 2007, 12:58
rstimaru rstimaru is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 279
quite agree with you Chris. We do,nt do much to preserve our heritage. I think we are in a culture of what is in for me. What does it cost? ( too much get rid of it) Bob
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 31st March 2007, 13:20
Syd young Syd young is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 101
I could never understand why the Mary went to the USA of the Lizze went to Japan after all we preserve the Great Britain in Bristol and the Warrior and Victory in Portsmouth,and these are Royal naval ships so why are Liners second best.I am sure visitors to both ships would have been lucrative income,this country was their home
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 31st March 2007, 16:40
PatBaltic22's Avatar
PatBaltic22 PatBaltic22 is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 34
Syd Young,
Long Beach aquired the Queen Mary due to money set aside from oil drilling. They wanted a maritime museum and the RMS Queen Mary fit the bill. You're right though. I do not know why Great Britain let the Queen mary slip out of their hands. We both can say thought hat whatever country she lies in, at least she is preserved and that is what matters. Preserving maritime heritage is crucial for our future population to learn of the world's history and the Queen mary is a perfect example of the fine British maritime heritage.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 31st March 2007, 18:42
RGascoyne's Avatar
RGascoyne RGascoyne is offline  
Ex UCL Pursers 64-67
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
My location
Posts: 517
I saw Queen Mary in Long Beach a month ago and she is looking a bit run down. With all the tales of bankruptcy and who now owns her and the debts, I guess the maintenance budgets are beginning to dry up. Her funnels have been bleached a horrible orange by the sun. If I can work out how, I will post a photo of her near sunset. BTW the QE(1) went to Hong Kong where she caught fire and was lost, while being converted to become a floating university.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 07Mex10x.jpg (37.8 KB, 19 views)
File Type: jpg 07Mex1.jpg (67.1 KB, 18 views)
File Type: jpg 07Mex2.jpg (43.1 KB, 22 views)

Last edited by RGascoyne : 31st March 2007 at 21:37.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 31st March 2007, 19:56
Santos Santos is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 0
The main problems now are the property developers who seem to me to want to obliterate any sign or example of maritime history whether Naval or Merchant.

Here on Merseyside there are number of examples of this. The Historic Warships have been evicted because of property development. The Liverpool Dock System is being decimated and filled in because of property development, and the famous Bar Lightship 'Planet' is in line for eviction from the Albert Dock, because in the words of certain business people ' she is not suitable for the Albert Dock ', she takes up too much room.

Soon Liverpool will have nothing of Maritime History left. It will consist of large expanses of luxery waterfront flats,appartments and offices which nobody can afford or want.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 3rd April 2007, 19:20
reklaw's Avatar
reklaw reklaw is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 534
Quote:
Originally Posted by Santos View Post
The main problems now are the property developers who seem to me to want to obliterate any sign or example of maritime history whether Naval or Merchant.
Soon Liverpool will have nothing of Maritime History left. It will consist of large expanses of luxery waterfront flats,appartments and offices which nobody can afford or want.
I suspect a similar thing is happening in Cape Town at the V&A waterfront, the accent is no longer on "working harbour" but on yuppies, expensive apartments, image, glitz and glamour. I dont know if its true but the maritime museum has been closed, the Alwyn Vintcent has been left to rot, the historic buildings have lost their history and ships and harbours do not feature in the grand scheme of things. Cape Town should have been the one that brought the Windsor Castle home, but it did not even feature on their future plans at all. Sorry to say but South Africa's history of shipping preservation is atrocious too.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 5th April 2007, 20:10
Jeff Taylor Jeff Taylor is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 227
I stayed onboard the Mary last spring during the QM/QM2 photo op when they met in Long Beach, and I concur that she is looking a bit run down, and honestly somewhat spooky at night in the hotel accomodatios. In case you hadn't heard, however, the operators and the town have finally resolved their differences, and are in the process of leasing a major parcel of land adjacent to the ship for development, and some of the proceeds are going to be used for major upgrades to the ship. Several plans are being evaluated, but the general focus will be to get rid of a lot of the tacky retail/food operations and exhibits which were added over the years, and restore major portions of the former public areas to their original glory. Don't hold your breath, but it sounds good.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 7th April 2007, 09:08
Rutts's Avatar
Rutts Rutts is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
My location
Posts: 662
Although she is not of the same calibre as passenger liners, the museum ship "Cap San Diego" which is moored in Hamburg still recieves contributions from her original owners Hamburg Sud for her upkeep and preservation. It was a year ago she was given an overhaul by Bohm + Voss that enabled classification and her return to seaworthiness. She is a living example of a vessel that dates back to the early 60's and the period before containerisation.
__________________
Steve
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Halcyon the Great Bob S Tankers 4 10th August 2008 19:24
Great Lakes steamer found too.! rushie News and Views from the Shipping World 0 21st August 2006 20:58
Great Lakes fleet expansion rushie News and Views from the Shipping World 0 9th June 2006 09:38
Ships Collide In Great Belt ruud News and Views from the Shipping World 2 7th December 2005 15:06
Great Western Jan Hendrik Passenger Liners 0 3rd October 2005 06:05



Search the net with ask.com
Support SN
Ask.com and get


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.