Support vessels should be reclassified as warships to stop overseas tenders - Ships Nostalgia
18:27

Welcome
Welcome!Welcome to Ships Nostalgia, the world's greatest online community for people worldwide with an interest in ships and shipping. Whether you are crew, ex-crew, ship enthusiasts or cruisers, this is the forum for you. And what's more, it's completely FREE.

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.
Log in
User Name Password

Support vessels should be reclassified as warships to stop overseas tenders

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 29th April 2019, 10:49
RHP RHP is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,156
Support vessels should be reclassified as warships to stop overseas tenders

Daily Telegraph: Alan Tovey, industry editor
28 APRIL 2019 • 10:40PM

Pressure is growing on the Government to reclassify Navy support vessels as warships, to save thousands of jobs.

A £1bn contract to build up to three Fleet Solid Support (FSS) ships has been tendered internationally: Ministers say that it had to be done under EU competition rules. However the Government faces increasing calls to list the vessels, which carry defensive weapons and supply the fleet with ammunition and stores, as warships. By national security requirements they would then have to be built in Britain.

Influential defence figures, including MP Julian Lewis, defence select committee chairman, and former Navy head Lord West of Spithead, have rubbished the Government ruling that FSS ships cannot be described as warships.

Former head of the Royal Navy Lord West has rubbished the idea of building the new ships abroad CREDIT: AP

They say the MoD is following EU rules as it could lead to cheaper foreign tenders – but it could turn out more expensive if UK jobs are lost.

Opening up the bids internationally also goes against the Government-backed National Shipbuilding Strategy, say critics. This policy aims to create a steady supply of work for UK yards and end the boom-and-bust cycle that destroys shipbuilding jobs as construction programmes of aircraft carriers, destroyers and frigates ebb and flow.

“An FSS is absolutely a military vessel – it’s nonsense to say it’s not,” said Lord West. “The Treasury has not calculated the true cost of building them abroad: the UK jobs that could be lost, the skills that will need to be relearned for future naval ship contracts.”

Mr Lewis added: “The only rules the Government is concerned about are EU ones – the idea that this long-term project should be fettered by rules of an organisation we are about to leave is ridiculous.” Both pointed to France giving a contract for similar ships to a French yard without external competition as evidence of how FSS ships could be reclassified for UK construction.

Construction Of Britain's Largest Warship HMS Queen Elizabeth
With work on Britain's new aircraft carriers winding down, jobs at UK shipyards are under threat CREDIT: GETTY

A UK consortium including Babcock, BAE Systems and Cammell Laird which bid for the contract – to be awarded in 2020 – faces rivals from Italy, Spain, Japan and South Korea.

Unions have said building FSS ships in Britain would bridge a gap in demand, with jobs under threat as work at Rosyth on the second Navy aircraft carrier nears an end. Recent losses saw Appledore shipyard in Devon closing and jobs going at Cammell Laird on Merseyside and at Rosyth.

Defence procurement minister Stuart Andrew said FSS ships do not have the same “complex weapons, sensors or design features” of carriers, destroyers or frigates so cannot be exempted from international tendering rules.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business...rs-navy-ships/
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29th April 2019, 11:38
James_C's Avatar
James_C James_C is offline   SN Supporter
Malim Sahib Moderator
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Department: Navigation
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
My location
Posts: 8,458
The supposed EU issue is a total red herring by a Tory government which deliberately does not want these ships built in the UK.
Whilst a government is obliged to invite tenders under EU rules (this is as much for transparency as anything else), that government is under no obligation whatsoever to select the cheapest tender. Instead, it is supposed to select that of "best value".The latter encompasses not only cost, but also a multitude of other considerations which includes things like impact on strategic industries, security, economy, effect on local jobs etc.
So even if a British yard submitted a tender which was the most expensive, it can still be awarded that contract without repercussion.
Leaving all that aside, defence projects are excluded from the competitive tendering regulations unless a governnment specifically chooses for that not to be the case.
Yet again the EU is being wrongly blamed for a decision wholly in the hands of the British government.
__________________
Regards,

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29th April 2019, 16:58
Engine Serang Engine Serang is online now  
Senior Member
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Department: Engineering
Active: 1970 - Present
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,669
How's the David Attenborough getting on?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Diving Support Vessels jhead Special Purpose Vessels 7 26th October 2018 17:51
Hello ????RN Fleet Tenders??? DCClancy Say Hello 5 4th October 2008 19:07



Support SN


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.1.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.