HMS Queen Elizabeth - Ships Nostalgia
12:16

Welcome
Welcome!Welcome to Ships Nostalgia, the world's greatest online community for people worldwide with an interest in ships and shipping. Whether you are crew, ex-crew, ship enthusiasts or cruisers, this is the forum for you. And what's more, it's completely FREE.

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.
Log in
User Name Password

HMS Queen Elizabeth

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 27th May 2019, 16:47
double acting double acting is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 187
HMS Queen Elizabeth

According to newspaper reports they are "replacing 284 hull valves", seems a bit strange, any clues as to why?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27th May 2019, 17:59
Erimus's Avatar
Erimus Erimus is offline  
Senior Member
Organisation: Maritime Enthusiast
Department: Office / Administration
Active: 1958 - 2010
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,867
Appears that that was one of the major reasons for the docking along with rudder cleaning and upgrading cathodic protection.

geoff
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27th May 2019, 18:10
seaman38 seaman38 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 672
Quote:
Originally Posted by double acting View Post
they are "replacing 284 hull valves", seems a bit strange, any clues as to why?
Perhaps they are leaking!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27th May 2019, 20:20
Stephen J. Card's Avatar
Stephen J. Card Stephen J. Card is online now  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,282
The captain's wife has open an iron monger's shop!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27th May 2019, 20:32
Engine Serang Engine Serang is offline  
Senior Member
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Department: Engineering
Active: 1970 - Present
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,916
And she'll deliver them, in small batches.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27th May 2019, 20:57
spongebob's Avatar
spongebob spongebob is offline
Spongebob
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Department: Engineering
Active: 1957 - 1961
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 8,821
Admiralty bought them from China as a job lot, wrong hand, clockwise to open.
A bit like those Japanese prunung saws, cut on the pull stroke.!

Bob
__________________
spongebob,
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27th May 2019, 21:18
Dickyboy's Avatar
Dickyboy Dickyboy is offline
Senior Member
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Department: Deck
Active: 1964 - 2009
 
Join Date: May 2009
My location
Posts: 8,579
Just as well they can do it now, she's no bloody good as warship at the moment anyway.
A chance to sort out the other one now they know there's a problem as well.
__________________
Good advice is usually ignored, but that's no reason for not giving it. Miss Marple.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27th May 2019, 21:42
Farmer John's Avatar
Farmer John Farmer John is offline  
Senior Member
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Department: Navigation
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,822
Disappointing, I clicked on this in case it was an advert for a new captain.
__________________
"The kitten and the snail got off the bus!"
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 28th May 2019, 07:55
Engine Serang Engine Serang is offline  
Senior Member
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Department: Engineering
Active: 1970 - Present
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,916
Was it only upon fitting the 284th valve that someone realised that the valves were upside down.
After a long and expensive inquiry it will be concluded that Billy the Fitter was to blame and middle-managers and above will get a bonus. Fair do's.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 28th May 2019, 08:13
RHP RHP is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,383
Cathodic protection and hull valves are such basic design factors, how can they get them wrong?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 28th May 2019, 10:47
YM-Mundrabilla's Avatar
YM-Mundrabilla YM-Mundrabilla is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,848
Forgive me for I am konfuzed.
Is the LH valve bit a belated April Fool's joke?
If so, on one hand, it has reached the stage that I don't know whether to believe it or not whilst, on the other hand, the concept seems so outrageous that it might just be true. (Too many hands doing we know not what, perhaps).
If true, who uses LH valves and for what purpose?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 28th May 2019, 11:00
James_C's Avatar
James_C James_C is offline   SN Supporter
Malim Sahib Moderator
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Department: Navigation
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
My location
Posts: 8,527
Prior to this recent docking the ship had been in the water for nearly 5 years (since July 2014) so it is no surprise that her underwater paintwork and anodes needed attention. Since she is classed by Lloyds Register to their warship rules, inspection of ship side valves is a surveyable item at 5 yearly intervals, hence their removal for inspection.
So for the avoidance of doubt for those out there who are desperate to sensationalise, there has been no massive cock up, accident or poor planning which has led to this docking or the work undertaken therein.
__________________
Regards,

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 29th May 2019, 06:31
Engine Serang Engine Serang is offline  
Senior Member
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Department: Engineering
Active: 1970 - Present
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,916
#1 "replacing 284 hull valves"

#1 2 inspection of ship side valves is a surveyable item at 5 yearly intervals, hence their removal for inspection.

False news or alternative facts?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 29th May 2019, 09:01
James_C's Avatar
James_C James_C is offline   SN Supporter
Malim Sahib Moderator
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Department: Navigation
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
My location
Posts: 8,527
Quote:
Originally Posted by Engine Serang View Post
#1 "replacing 284 hull valves"

#1 2 inspection of ship side valves is a surveyable item at 5 yearly intervals, hence their removal for inspection.

False news or alternative facts?

Perhaps lost in translation. Although being the RN/MOD I must admit there's every possibility they'll just remove and replace rather than inspect/overhaul and replace, especially after the shambles with Endurance.
__________________
Regards,

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 29th May 2019, 09:04
Lao Pan Lao Pan is offline  
Member
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Department: Engineering
Active: 1977 - 1983
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 46
replacing 284 hull valves ...upgrading cathodic protection.

maybe for the last 5 years the valves have been working as sacrificial anodes

...Perhaps they are leaking! - I got some Wood, Cement & Washing Soda if anyone wants to fix em before Drydock or the Engine-room floods
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 29th May 2019, 20:00
Burntisland Ship Yard's Avatar
Burntisland Ship Yard Burntisland Ship Yard is offline  
Senior Member
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Department: Engineering
Active: 1974 - 1982
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 391
Is there a modern version of cement boxes ???
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 29th May 2019, 22:32
Engine Serang Engine Serang is offline  
Senior Member
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Department: Engineering
Active: 1970 - Present
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burntisland Ship Yard View Post
Is there a modern version of cement boxes ???
My two would be Class and Port State.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 29th May 2019, 23:18
dannic dannic is offline  
Senior Member
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Department: Engineering
Active: 1974 - Present
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 189
Quote:
Originally Posted by James_C View Post
Prior to this recent docking the ship had been in the water for nearly 5 years (since July 2014) so it is no surprise that her underwater paintwork and anodes needed attention. Since she is classed by Lloyds Register to their warship rules, inspection of ship side valves is a surveyable item at 5 yearly intervals, hence their removal for inspection.
So for the avoidance of doubt for those out there who are desperate to sensationalise, there has been no massive cock up, accident or poor planning which has led to this docking or the work undertaken therein.
Merchant vessels open and inspect, overhaul and then submit for for survey. Government paid for, they will be renewed, and subsequently sold on.
Dannic
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 31st May 2019, 03:08
Olaf_the_blue's Avatar
Olaf_the_blue Olaf_the_blue is offline  
Member
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Department: Engineering
Active: 1964 - 2001
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
My location
Posts: 5
Lao Pan is probably pretty close to the mark with his "maybe for the last 5 years the valves have been working as sacrificial anodes." The give-away is the reference to cathodic protection upgrade. With ICCP systems, (Impressed Current Cathodic Protection,) if not designed and operated correctly they can strip the zinc out of brass/bronze valves attached as hull fittings making them leaky and more brittle. Could be an oops at the design end or running the ICCP to aggressively.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 31st May 2019, 08:51
Steve Oatey's Avatar
Steve Oatey Steve Oatey is offline
Senior Member
Organisation: Other Merchant Fleets
Department: Engineering
Active: 1971 - Present
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,210
Contract language is very important. Replace is not the same as renew.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 31st May 2019, 10:27
Varley's Avatar
Varley Varley is online now   SN Supporter
Senior Member
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Active: 1971 - 2011
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Olaf_the_blue View Post
Lao Pan is probably pretty close to the mark with his "maybe for the last 5 years the valves have been working as sacrificial anodes." The .............be an oops at the design end or running the ICCP to aggressively.
I don't agree with your last ('aggressively'). The only real meaning of overprotection is to generate gas bubbles and blow off the paint. De-zincification would only occur if it were being sacrificial (ie underprotection).

Denholm's had relinquished Mr. Rappaport's fleet to Acomarit and this included two Russian built bulk carriers with enormous and unstable ICCP power unit. One each side every hatch break! Were the wielder of the terminal screwdriver to have had the touch of a midwife he would still have been hard pressed to adjust the output in the very small band between sod all and very much all.

Not long after I got a call from Dick Swindall (formerly my line manager and now deserted to Acomarit) asking innocently if I had ever seen an ICCP'd hull with a 'sort of etched look' and no paint. Havin already reported that the best use of these vessels' ICCP, if not subject to expert attention, would be to anchor-off the vessel prior to her next drydock and use it to blow the paint off and save on blasting.

Sure enough the question was about one of the subject bulkers.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 31st May 2019, 14:28
uncle Ray uncle Ray is offline  
Member
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Department: Deck
Active: 1969 - 1977
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by Varley View Post
I don't agree with your last ('aggressively'). The only real meaning of overprotection is to generate gas bubbles and blow off the paint. De-zincification would only occur if it were being sacrificial (ie underprotection).
It is possible to over protect a vessel with an ICCP system, if the voltage is too high for an excessive period of time it will cause Hydrogen embrittlement and as a result of this the likes of valve stems and spades made of lesser noble metals will suffer, reference cells are strategically placed around the vessel to monitor the voltage output but as most ICCP units are placed to the aft of the vessel the reference cells up Fwd will give a lesser reading to the aft reference cells therefore a happy medium must be reached. Once the ICCIP system has been switched on for the first time it will take many days for it to become fully effective and vice versa if it is switched off it will take just as long to UN protect the vessel, Ive heard of some vessels switching off the system from time to time to prevent any problems such as embrittlement.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 31st May 2019, 16:01
Lao Pan Lao Pan is offline  
Member
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Department: Engineering
Active: 1977 - 1983
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by Varley View Post
... two Russian built bulk carriers with enormous and unstable ICCP power unit. One each side every hatch break!
Are you sure the Russians intended them for ICCP use - having sailed on a couple of Russian built ships they were just as likely originally designed for hull degaussing for passing through mine fields
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 31st May 2019, 18:20
Varley's Avatar
Varley Varley is online now   SN Supporter
Senior Member
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Active: 1971 - 2011
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by uncle Ray View Post
It is possible to over protect a vessel with an ICCP system, if the voltage is too high for an excessive period of time it will cause Hydrogen embrittlement and as a result of this the likes of valve stems and spades made of lesser noble metals will suffer, reference cells are strategically placed around the vessel to monitor the voltage output but as most ICCP units are placed to the aft of the vessel the reference cells up Fwd will give a lesser reading to the aft reference cells therefore a happy medium must be reached. Once the ICCIP system has been switched on for the first time it will take many days for it to become fully effective and vice versa if it is switched off it will take just as long to UN protect the vessel, Ive heard of some vessels switching off the system from time to time to prevent any problems such as embrittlement.
I think it is highly unlikely that one will come across hydrogen embrittlement on a hull unless and unusually it is made of high tensile steel. Again, even that would, I think, be more likely due to manufacturing than free hydrogen absorbed from its interface with the paint.

I did hear it talked about WRT MV Arctic and extremely cold water operations but I think that, too, was eventually discounted.

I am no metallurgist nor am I a gambler but I will take a bet that one is more likely to diagnose one's ICCP putting out too much from a side full of missing paint than waiting for the odd crack from hydrogen embrittlement. Any metallic suffering from overprotection will not involve it having been sacrificial, by definition, although with the Russian system it might well have been burned off!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 31st May 2019, 18:30
Varley's Avatar
Varley Varley is online now   SN Supporter
Senior Member
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Active: 1971 - 2011
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lao Pan View Post
Are you sure the Russians intended them for ICCP use - having sailed on a couple of Russian built ships they were just as likely originally designed for hull degaussing for passing through mine fields
The pair had other features that might have been more to do with auxiliary duty as well as a few absolute horrors the worst being her "halon" system. This consisted of two fluids (as stored). One being slightly flammable itself and the other employed to supress the first. Unfortunately whether effective or not it was highly carcinogenic.

Almost every load was capable of being connected to the emergency switchboard via a huge changeover switch local to each starter.

The bitter ends of both cables were easily releasable with I metre diameter handwheels.

As far as I remember she did not have any degaussing gear (I have only seen this once on one of the Cenargo vessels, can't remember which). I do imagine, though that the ICCP could have provided a set of coils with enough juice to send the North Pole on its way back to Canada.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth samuel j Ships No More 3 2nd February 2008 01:09



Support SN


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.1.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.