RMAS Victoria - Ships Nostalgia
04:20

Welcome
Welcome!Welcome to Ships Nostalgia, the world's greatest online community for people worldwide with an interest in ships and shipping. Whether you are crew, ex-crew, ship enthusiasts or cruisers, this is the forum for you. And what's more, it's completely FREE.

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.
Log in
User Name Password

RMAS Victoria

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 30th December 2010, 08:18
NickNZ's Avatar
NickNZ NickNZ is offline  
Senior Member
Organisation: Maritime Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
My location
Posts: 5,382
RMAS Victoria

Having just seen a photo of her on this website; I have to ask. What is occurring??
She is described as " For inserting Special Forces..."
Can someone explain why this is so?
I am not questioning the RMAS in any sense. But rather why the RN does not have this vessel under it's auspices.
__________________
NickNZ

Proud to be a Kiwi Janner
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30th December 2010, 08:35
wigger wigger is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
My location
Posts: 3,722
I'm sure somebody can shed more light Nick, but her predecessor Newton often supported SF as well, saw her a few times with interesting craft on deck.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30th December 2010, 11:40
Kinnie Kinnie is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 511
Her name is SD Victoria. RMAS is long defunct. I would be surprised if the SF function was anything more than training. Don't be taken in by the builder's publicity blurbs.

Last edited by Kinnie; 30th December 2010 at 11:56..
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30th December 2010, 22:45
NickNZ's Avatar
NickNZ NickNZ is offline  
Senior Member
Organisation: Maritime Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
My location
Posts: 5,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinnie View Post
Her name is SD Victoria. RMAS is long defunct. I would be surprised if the SF function was anything more than training. Don't be taken in by the builder's publicity blurbs.
Apologies for the RMAS/SD gaffe, force of habit. Perhaps you should take the Moderators to task for naming this section RMAS instead of the 'proper' SD.
What IS her 'normal' purpose then?
__________________
NickNZ

Proud to be a Kiwi Janner

Last edited by NickNZ; 31st December 2010 at 09:14..
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 31st December 2010, 09:38
OLD STRAWBERRY's Avatar
OLD STRAWBERRY OLD STRAWBERRY is offline  
Senior Member
Organisation: Royal Fleet Auxilary
Department: Deck
Active: 1958 - 2006
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,109
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickNZ View Post
Apologies for the RMAS/SD gaffe, force of habit. Perhaps you should take the Moderators to task for naming this section RMAS instead of the 'proper' SD.
What IS her 'normal' purpose then?
Don't start that Nick!. It has taken ages to get the MODS to set up an PAS/RMAS section both in the gallery and forums. Don't rock the boat now Mate. The SN has decided to add Serco Denholm vessels into the same category as most of them work in the dockyards and for the MOD and many of them were ex PAS/RMAS as well, admittedly I wasn't too keen on the idea Myself but I am happy to accept the status quo. All You have to do is make sure You get the titles correct I am sure it is not that difficult!. And with that a happy new year to You.
__________________
REGARDS.TONY. (OLD STRAWBS.)(DISCHARGE BOOK No R691311) CAREER (1956-1958) T S ARETHUSA(215, QDST, 21 MESS)/ (1958-1963)/ RFA/ (1964-1965) AUWE / (1965/1973) SHORESIDE/ (1973-1995)PAS/RMAS (PORTLAND NAVAL BASE)/ (1996-2002) RFA/ (2002-2005) HMP WEARE.

Last edited by OLD STRAWBERRY; 31st December 2010 at 09:43..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 31st December 2010, 11:41
NickNZ's Avatar
NickNZ NickNZ is offline  
Senior Member
Organisation: Maritime Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
My location
Posts: 5,382
I am happy to abide by your suggestion Strawbs. I have no axe to grind on this subject.
I have family who have. and comtinue to serve in the the tugs (The Fosters of Devonport) which are operated by the powers that be, at least they have kept the main part of the vessels buff and black.
__________________
NickNZ

Proud to be a Kiwi Janner
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12th January 2011, 12:29
Waighty's Avatar
Waighty Waighty is offline  
Senior Member
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Department: Deck
Active: 1966 - 2009
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,337
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD STRAWBERRY View Post
Don't start that Nick!. It has taken ages to get the MODS to set up an PAS/RMAS section both in the gallery and forums. Don't rock the boat now Mate. The SN has decided to add Serco Denholm vessels into the same category as most of them work in the dockyards and for the MOD and many of them were ex PAS/RMAS as well, admittedly I wasn't too keen on the idea Myself but I am happy to accept the status quo. All You have to do is make sure You get the titles correct I am sure it is not that difficult!. And with that a happy new year to You.
I spent some time correspondingng with "Andy" who agreed to set up the Royal Maritime auxiliary Service sub site and I'm very grateful for his help. I feel the site should serve the ex RMAS side and the current SD side, after all it's the same job being done - marine support to the RN principally, the other two services and OGDs (other gov't depts).

SD Victoria has been given the Red Ensign I assume to make her able to go anywhere without dipclear restraints and not forgetting it's cheaper than a RN vessel!

Please support this sub site otherwise it will disappear.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12th June 2011, 12:07
Slowone Slowone is offline  
Member
Organisation: Tugs
Department: Engineering
Active: 1980 - Present
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 90
SD Victoria, like SD Newton before her sailed under the red ensign when not working on MoD business, read into that what you want. She is offering ship staff new challenges working out how to undertake tasks with new equipment and a ship with different characteristics to the good old Newton. I understand they are basking in the sun at the moment.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 13th June 2011, 10:41
joe732 joe732 is offline  
Senior Member
Department: Deck
Active: 1980 - Present
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slowone View Post
SD Victoria, like SD Newton before her sailed under the red ensign when not working on MoD business, read into that what you want. She is offering ship staff new challenges working out how to undertake tasks with new equipment and a ship with different characteristics to the good old Newton. I understand they are basking in the sun at the moment.
SD Victoria was built for Serco, to be run under the Red Ensign.

I don't see how this could change just because she was working on MOD business?

Would that not entail re-flagging the vessel every time, if there is an implication that, on some tasks, she is not Red Ensign?

I don't think for a minute, that the MCGA, for all it's faults would allow any opting in and out of flag status, just to suit any commercial/MOD business, whichever is the flavour of the day.
Also, the costs would be prohibitive for a commercial company.

I'm quite sure that this would be news to the crew working on her also. (That she is not Red Ensign when operating on MOD business?)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 13th June 2011, 19:49
James_C's Avatar
James_C James_C is offline   SN Supporter
Malim Sahib Moderator
Organisation: Merchant Navy
Department: Navigation
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
My location
Posts: 8,555
It is quite possible to be British flag and then opt in and out of the regulations dependant on the nature of the task the vessel is performing, indeed warships, auxiliaries and state owned or operated ships have the right of exemption from the SOLAS and MARPOL regulations. The relevant text for these exemptions can be found in the "Application" preamble in both documents.
Regarding change of ensign (red to blue and vice versa) there are precedents, and in the legal sense not a huge amount changes as the vessel concerned is still a British flag ship, all that changes is the nature of her work.
For instance, a good few years ago the RFA would occasionally charter out its tankers to commercial companies for one off voyages or the like when they weren't required for use with the MOD.
For the duration of those (civilian) charters they flew the Red Ensign, even though the ship was still painted grey and had a full RFA crew. Said ships then reverted back to the RFA ensign on completion of the charter.
There has also been a number of red ensign commercial survey ships chartered by the MOD/Govt, and when in Govt service they have flown the blue ensign.

Regarding 'SD Victoria'; as has been mentioned, she has directly replaced 'Newton' and is used for training purposes, not operations.
__________________
Regards,

Jim

Last edited by James_C; 13th June 2011 at 19:52..
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 17th June 2011, 19:53
mil511mariner's Avatar
mil511mariner mil511mariner is offline
Member
Department: Navigation
Active: 1975 - Present
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 47
It is quite amusing how the AIS signal from SD Victoria appears and disappears at times..............
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 18th June 2011, 20:40
Slowone Slowone is offline  
Member
Organisation: Tugs
Department: Engineering
Active: 1980 - Present
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 90
AIS comes and goes because of the nature of the system - VHF range is quite short plus many area outside of europe do not have full coverage - well thats what I understand of the system
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 20th June 2011, 16:09
RetiredPMSO RetiredPMSO is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by mil511mariner View Post
It is quite amusing how the AIS signal from SD Victoria appears and disappears at times..............
Back up and showing on Marinetraffic as arriving in Plymouth today, though how the heck it works out that she was doing 57.6 knots is beyond me!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 20th June 2011, 19:28
Slowone Slowone is offline  
Member
Organisation: Tugs
Department: Engineering
Active: 1980 - Present
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 90
Its a secret, have to wipe you out if anyone gets to know ;-) !!!!!!!!!

or the hardware is buggered .... again
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 21st June 2011, 18:01
mil511mariner's Avatar
mil511mariner mil511mariner is offline
Member
Department: Navigation
Active: 1975 - Present
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 47
Back in Plymouth as Ron says in his post - but no vessel history - the boat just turns up in mid channel.

Marinetraffic,com and shipais.com both usually have good coverage out to Ushant and marinetraffic covers many areas of the world.

And yes slow one you are correct limited to VHF range aprox 45 miles or so depending on atmospherics, aerial height and power of the transmitter.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 8th October 2011, 19:58
STRAWBERRY's Avatar
STRAWBERRY STRAWBERRY is offline  
Senior Member
Organisation: Port Authorities
Department: Deck
Active: 1984 - Present
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 570
SD Victoria, was built to replace the Newton. But the Newton was originally a trials vessel, but later to adopt a role as a training vessel for the royal marines and the like, and that is pretty much all she did. Trial seemingly no longer taking place. So the Victoria, was built to adopt this Training role solely! Not requiring the vessel to take on a trials role! Andy
__________________
Champion Barbed Wire Hurdler...Until my Tragic Accident
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 9th May 2012, 15:26
tyneboy tyneboy is offline  
Senior Member
Organisation: Maritime Enthusiast
Department: Engineering
Active: 1965 - Present
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 197
I always thought that as Victoria was built as a World Wide Support ship that she was supposed to be much more than a training ship. With its complement of marines and both fast attack motorboats and RIBs it would be great for anti-piracy role
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 9th May 2012, 15:42
RetiredPMSO RetiredPMSO is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyneboy View Post
I always thought that as Victoria was built as a World Wide Support ship that she was supposed to be much more than a training ship. With its complement of marines and both fast attack motorboats and RIBs it would be great for anti-piracy role
Good theory but Victoria does not have a complement of Marines the numbers will vary from nil to whatever the size of the training task is, and the worldwide is to allow training to take place on worldwide basis ranging from Norway to the tropics. Equally any change of role would require a change to the contract with Serco.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fort Victoria Pat Kennedy Royal Fleet Auxiliary 10 15th November 2010 22:52
Victoria john g Passenger Liners 4 11th August 2009 06:57
Queen Victoria JimWinsor News and Views from the Shipping World 8 24th September 2007 19:51
Costa Victoria Ian Costa line 1 2nd December 2004 15:07
Fort Victoria Fairfield Royal Fleet Auxiliary 0 7th May 2004 22:09



Support SN


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.1.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.