Joined
·
353 Posts
It's probably been discussed, pontificated over before, many times, but I've just seen it:
On the album cover of the original 'Beatles For Sale' LP, there's a fifth Beatle! The LP was released, I believe, in late '64, the cover photograph (according to Wikipedia) shot in London's Hyde Park. If you take a look over the top of Ringo's head, in a vertical dark area, possibly an out of focus tree trunk, you'll see, near the top, what just could be the partial image of another moptop. You can see it fairly clearly, if you look; same hair style, exact same length, just a little bit of ear showing, but only one side, the right side.
Could it possibly be Stuart Sutcliffe, who was the fifth Beatle for a while, until he left the group in Hamburg, where he tragically died in the early '60's, well before 'For Sale'?
Just a juxtaposition of the background foliage, in all likelihood, but something to ponder for those of us who do such things.
On the album cover of the original 'Beatles For Sale' LP, there's a fifth Beatle! The LP was released, I believe, in late '64, the cover photograph (according to Wikipedia) shot in London's Hyde Park. If you take a look over the top of Ringo's head, in a vertical dark area, possibly an out of focus tree trunk, you'll see, near the top, what just could be the partial image of another moptop. You can see it fairly clearly, if you look; same hair style, exact same length, just a little bit of ear showing, but only one side, the right side.
Could it possibly be Stuart Sutcliffe, who was the fifth Beatle for a while, until he left the group in Hamburg, where he tragically died in the early '60's, well before 'For Sale'?
Just a juxtaposition of the background foliage, in all likelihood, but something to ponder for those of us who do such things.